Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses

“Come, Dark-eyed Sleep”: Michael Field and the Performance of the Lyric as a Radical Fantasy

Mayron Estefan Cantillo Lucuara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2021.35.02

Abstract

This article seeks to illustrate how the Michael Fields articulate their Sapphic poetry in Long Ago (1889) not only in keeping with their own Shakespearean aspirations and with Robert Browning’s hybrid formula of dramatic lyrics, but also in connection with Jonathan Culler’s theory of the lyric as a performative genre. Much recent scholarship has broken ground in the rediscovery and reappraisal of the Fields’ literary stature, yet the general critical approach has been divisive in addressing their poetry and their verse dramas separately. Some critics have taken heed of how their lyrics in general exhibit an intrinsic dramatic temper, yet no systematic inquiry has discussed how this lyrical dramaticity is manifest in any particular instance. Thus, this article singles out Long Ago’s second poem for its powerful performative energy, offering a close reading of each line, and demonstrating that it amounts to a hybrid dramatic lyric, as well as a tragic and transgressive performance in which a new Sappho takes centre stage as a Dionysian apologist of radical erotic fantasies.

Keywords

Michael Field; lyric; performance; Long Ago; Sappho

Full Text:

PDF Statistics

References

BICKLE, Sharon. 2010. “Victorian Mænads: On Michael Field’s Callirrhoë and Being Driven Mad.” The Michaelian 2. Available at: http://www.thelatchkey.org/Field/MF2/bicklearticle.htm.

BICKLE, Sharon. 2012. “Disability and gender in the visual field: seeing the subterranean lives of Michael Field's William Rufus (1885).” Victorian Literature and Culture 40 (1): 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150311000283

BLAIN, Virginia. 1996. “Michael Field, the two-headed nightingale: Lesbian Text as Palimpsest.” Women's History Review 5 (2): 239-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612029600200117

BRISTOW, Joseph. 2019. “Michael Field’s ‘Unwomanly Audacities’: Attila, My Attila!, Sexual Modernity and the London Stage.” In Parker and Parejo Vadillo 2019, 123-150.

BURROUGHS, Catherine, ed. 2019. Closet Drama: History, Theory, Form. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107394

CANTILLO-LUCUARA, Mayron E. 2018c. “Michael Field's Sapphism: An Ontology of the Feminine in Long Ago (1889).” Lectora. Revista de Dones i Textualitat 24: 205-222.

CANTILLO-LUCUARA, Mayron E. 2018b. “Michael Field’s Long Ago (1889) as a Paradigm of Intertextual Theory: From Strangeness to Metaxology.” Cuadernos de Investigación Filológica 44: 185-210. https://doi.org/10.18172/cif.3442

CANTILLO-LUCUARA, Mayron E. 2018c. “Michael Field’s Long Ago (1889): A Transcendental Mythopoesis of Desire and Death.” ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies 39: 69-96. https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.39.2018.69-96

CULLER, Jonathan. 2015. Theory of the Lyric. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674425781

DAU, Duc and Shale Presto, eds. 2015. Queer Victorian Families: Curious Relations in Literature. New York and London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315762067

DELLAMORA, Richard. 2007. “The Sapphic Culture of Michael Field and Radclyffe Hall.” In Stetz and. Wilson 2007, 127-136.

DUBOIS, Page. 2015. Sappho. London and New York: I. B. Tauris. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755695195

EASTHAM, Andrew. 2011. “Bacchic Transference and Ecstatic Faith: Michael Field's Callirrhoë and the Origins of Drama.” Women’s Studies 40: 491-512. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2011.561743

EHNENN, Jill R. 2008. Women's Literary Collaboration, Queerness and Late-Victorian Culture. London: Routledge.

EVANGELISTA, Stefano. 2009. British Aestheticism and the Ancient Greece: Hellenism, Reception, Gods in Exile. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242203

FIELD, Michael. 1889. Long Ago. London: George Bell and Sons.

HOMER. 1919. The Odyssey with an English Translation by A.T. Murray, PH.D. Cambridge, MA., Harvard University Press.

KIRBY, J. 2017. “Heroines, Anti-Heroines and New Women: The Early Drama of Michael Field, 1884-1895.” PhD diss., University of Westminster.

KRISUK, Jennifer. 2010. “Moving beyond ‘Michael Field’: Identity through anonymity in Borgia.” The Michaelian 2, http://www.thelatchkey.org/Field/MF2/krisukarticle.htm

LEE, Michele. 2019. “Michael Field’s Stephania: The closet drama as a space for female fortitude and artistic agency.” In Burroughs 2019, 68-80.

LEIGHTON, Angela. 1992. Victorian Women Poets: Writing Against the Heart. Oxford: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

MADDEN, Ed. 2008. Tiresian Poetics: Modernism, Sexuality, Voice, 1888-2001. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

O’GORMAN, Francis. 2006. “Michael Field and Sapphic Fame: ‘My dark-leaved laurels will endure.’” Victorian Literature and Culture 34 (2): 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1060150306051369

OLVERSON, D. Tracy. 2010. Women Writers and the Dark Side of Late-Victorian Hellenism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246805

OLVERSON, D. Tracy. 2015. “Michael Field’s Dramatically Queer Family Dynamics.” In Dau and Preston 2015, 57-76.

PARKER, Sarah and A. Parejo Vadillo, eds. 2019. Michael Field: Decadent Moderns. Ohio: Ohio University Press.

PLETT, Heinrich. 2010. Literary Rhetoric: Concepts - Structures – Analyses. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004171138.i-320

PRINS, Yopie. 1999. Victorian Sappho. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

STETZ, Margaret. D. and Cheryl A. Wilson, eds. 2007. Michael Field and Their World. Birmingham: The Rivendale Press.

STURGEON, Mary. 1922. Michael Field. London: George G. Harrap & Co.

THAIN, Marion. 2007. ‘Michael Field’ Poetry, Aestheticism, and the Fin de Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511484933

THAIN, Marion and A. Parejo Vadillo, eds. 2009. Michael Field, The Poet. Published and Manuscript Materials. Toronto: Broadview Editions.

THOMAS, Kate. 2019. “Vegetable Love: Michael Field’s Queer Ecology.” In Parker and Vadillo, eds., 25-46, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

TREBY. Ivor C. 2000. Music and Silence: The Gamut of Michael Field. Suffolk: De Blackland Press.

VADILLO, A. Parejo. 2007. “Outmoded Dramas: History and Modernity in Michael Field’s Aesthetic Plays.” In Stetz Margaret and Cheryl A. Wilson 2007, 237-248.

VADILLO, A. Parejo. 2015. “‘This hot–house of decadent chronicle’: Michael Field, Nietzsche and the Dance of Modern Poetic Drama.” Women: A Cultural Review 26 (3): 195-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2015.1079994

WHITE, Chris. 1996. “Flesh and Roses: Michael Field’s Metaphors of Pleasure and Desire.” Women’s Writing 3 (1): 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969908960030104




DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2021.35.02

Copyright (c) 2021 Mayron Estefan Cantillo Lucuara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.