Literary Burden(s): Genre, Manuscript Culture and the Ethics of Non-Transmission in Hester Pulter’s The Unfortunate Florinda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.33026Keywords:
Hester Pulter, The Unfortunate Florinda, manuscript culture, prose romance, complaint, non-transmission, literary burden, sexual violence, genre, seventeenth-century women’s writing, English Civil WarAbstract
This article examines Hester Pulter’s prose romance The Unfortunate Florinda (MS Lt q 32, c. 1651–65) through the concept of Literary Burden, a category I propose here, standing for the intersection of generic pressure, the asymmetry between Pulter’s voracious reading and her exclusion from print, and the ethical impossibility of narrative closure after sexual violence. Reading Pulter’s lyrics, emblems and unfinished romance together, I argue that the work’s double non-ending–the truncated “happy” at the close of Part I, juxtaposed with “Finis,” and the “till” suspended at the close of Part II–constitutes a principled refusal. Continuation would require either falsifying trauma through the consolation the romance form promises or reinscribing violation through narrative compulsion. Where existing readings (Herman 2010; Jacobs 2014; Zhang 2018) have foregrounded the romance’s political register and Florinda’s active agency, I identify a parallel level at which the form of the manuscript registers what the plot’s politics cannot resolve. Situating Pulter’s romance within the female-authored romance tradition mapped by Hackett (2000) and in association with the notion of complaint as reframed by Ross and Smith (2020b), the article reads The Unfortunate Florinda as the prose-romance extension of a formal habit: a sustained pressure on inherited consolatory forms to the point at which they stop. Drawing on Assmann on storage memory, Ricoeur on the work of mourning, Rosenfeld on clausal endlessness, Ferguson on rape narrative and Dolan on female credibility, I propose that unfinishedness is simultaneously the only ethical response available to Pulter and the condition that secures her exclusion from the canon she had read but could not enter.
Funding
This article is a result of the research project “Women and the Early Novel in English, 1621-1699: The European Context,” financed by PAIDI 2020 (Call 2021), Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Universidad, Investigación e Innovación (PROYEXCEL_00186).References
Assmann, Aleida. 2011. Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Bates, Catherine, ed. 2018. A Companion to Renaissance Poetry. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118585184
Britland, Karen. 2018. “Conspiring with ‘Friends’: Hester Pulter’s Poetry and the Stanley Family at Cumberlow Green.” The Review of English Studies 69 (292): 832–854. https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgy058
Clewell, Tammy. 2004a. “Consolation Refused: Virginia Woolf, the Great War, and Modernist Mourning.” Modern Fiction Studies 50 (1): 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1353/mfs.2004.0002
Clewell, Tammy. 2004b. “Mourning Beyond Melancholia: Freud’s Psychoanalysis of Loss.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 52 (1): 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651040520010601
Clewell, Tammy. 2009. Mourning, Modernism, Postmodernism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dodds Lara and Michelle M. Dowd. 2020. “Happy Accidents: Critical Belatedness, Feminist Formalism, and Early Modern Women’s Writing.” Criticism 62 (2) Spring: 169–193. https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.62.2.0169
Dolan, Frances E. 2013. True Relations: Reading, Literature, and Evidence in Seventeenth-Century England. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812207798
Dolan, Frances E. 2020. “Hester Pulter’s Renaissance.” English Literary Renaissance 50 (1): 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/706216
Dunn, Rachel. 2015. “Breaking a Tradition: Hester Pulter and the English Emblem Book.” The Seventeenth Century 30 (1): 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268117X.2015.1007157
Eardley, Alice, ed. 2014. Poems, Emblems, and The Unfortunate Florinda by Lady Hester Pulter. Toronto: Iter and Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies.
Eardley, Alice. 2017. “‘Shut up in a Countrey Grange’: The Provenance of Lady Hester Pulter’s Poetry and Prose and Women’s Literary History.” Huntington Library Quarterly 80 (2): 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1353/hlq.2017.0020
Enterline, Lynn. 2020. “‘Past the Help of Law’: Epyllia and the Female Complaint.” In Ross and Smith 2020a, 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42946-1_15
Ezell, Margaret J. M. 1993. Writing Women’s Literary History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
Ezell, Margaret J. M. 1999. Social Authorship and the Advent of Print. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
Ezell, Margaret J. M. 2008. “The Laughing Tortoise: Speculations on Manuscript Sources and Women’s Book History.” English Literary Renaissance 38 (2): 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6757.2008.00126.x
Ferguson, Frances. 1987. “Rape and the Rise of the Novel.” Representations 20: 88–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928503
Goodrich, Jaime and Paula McQuade, eds. 2021. “Beyond Canonicity: The Future(s) of Early Modern Women Writers.” Special issue, Criticism 63 (1–2): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.63.1-2.0001
Hackett, Helen. 2000. Women and Romance Fiction in the English Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518904
Hall, Louisa. 2018. “Hester Pulter’s Brave New Worlds.” In Rumrich and Fallon 2018, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381499.011
Herman, Peter C. 2010. “Lady Hester Pulter’s The Unfortunate Florinda: Race, Religion, and the Politics of Rape.” Renaissance Quarterly 63 (4): 1208–1246. https://doi.org/10.1086/658510
Jacobs, Nicole A. 2014. “Lady Hester Pulter’s The Unfortunate Florinda and the Conventions of Sexual Violence.” Appositions: Studies in Renaissance / Early Modern Literature & Culture 7. [Accessed online on March 28, 2026]
Knight, Leah, and Wendy Wall, gen. eds. 2018–. The Pulter Project: Poet in the Making. https://pulterproject.northwestern.edu [Accessed online on March 28, 2026]
Lanham, Richard A. 1976. The Motives of Eloquence: Literary Rhetoric in the Renaissance. New Haven: Yale UP.
Marotti, Arthur F. 1995. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca: Cornell UP.
McKitterick, David. 2003. Print, Manuscript and the Search for Order, 1450–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Pallotti, Donatella. 2013. “Maps of Woe: Narratives of Rape in Early Modern England.” Journal of Early Modern Studies 2: 211–239. https://doi.org/10.13128/JEMS-2279-7149-12637
Pulter, Hester. c. 1651–65. MS Lt q 32. University of Leeds, Brotherton Collection.
Ricoeur, Paul. 2004. Memory, History, Forgetting. Transl. by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago: U of Chicago P. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226713465.001.0001
Robson, Mark. 2005. “Reading Hester Pulter Reading.” Literature Compass 2 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2005.00162.x
Rosenfeld, Colleen Ruth. 2009. “Wroth’s Clause.” ELH 76 (4): 1049–1071. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.0.0069
Ross, Sarah C. E. 2015. Women, Poetry, and Politics in Seventeenth-Century Britain. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724209.001.0001
Ross, Sarah C. E. 2020. “Complaint’s Echoes.” In Ross and Smith 2020a, 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42946-1_9
Ross, Sarah C. E. and Rosalind Smith, eds. 2020a. Early Modern Women’s Complaint: Gender, Form, and Politics. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42946-1
Ross, Sarah C. E. and Rosalind Smith. 2020b. “Beyond Ovid: Early Modern Women’s Complaint.” Ross and Smith 2020a, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42946-1_1
Rumrich, John and Stephen M. Fallon, eds. 2018. Immortality and the Body in the Age of Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108381499
Salzman, Paul. 2020. “The Politics of Complaint in Mary Wroth’s Love’s Victory and The Second Part of The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania.” In Ross and Smith 2020a, 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42946-1_7
Scott-Baumann, Elizabeth. 2013. Forms of Engagement: Women, Poetry and Culture 1640–80. Oxford: Oxford UP. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676521.001.0001
Scott-Baumann, Elizabeth. 2020. “Hester Pulter’s Well-Wrought Urns: Early Modern Women, Sonnets, and New Criticism.” Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 20 (2): 120–143. https://doi.org/10.1353/jem.2020.0012
Wall, Wendy. 2018. “Female Authorship.” In Bates 2018, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118585184.ch9
Waller, Gary. 1993. The Sidney Family Romance: Mary Wroth, William Herbert, and the Early Modern Construction of Gender. Detroit: Wayne State UP.
Watkin, William. 2004. On Mourning: Theories of Loss in Modern Literature. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
Zhang, Rachel Dunn. 2018. “Crafting Un-Fortune: Rape, Romance, and Resistance in Hester Pulter’s The Unfortunate Florinda.” Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 12 (2): 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1353/emw.2018.0004
Zhang, Rachel Dunn. 2024. Reimagining Constancy in the English Civil Wars. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781399524780
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jorge Casanova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
