Manipulative rhetoric in 17th and 18th century sermons: aporia, the borders of reason
Keywords:Religious sermons, Rhetorical manipulation, Persuasion, Aporia, 17th-18th centuries
AbstractIt is my aim in this paper to explore the role of aporia as a rhetorical instrument that is used in religious sermons in order to manipulate the audience and try to convince them of a truth derived from the textual evidence of the Bible. In this context, aporia appears as a rhetorical figure by which the speaker expresses to be in doubt about a question, or presents an insoluble paradox or contradiction in the text’s meaning. I believe that the function of aporia in religious sermons has never been analysed as yet. To that extent, I will illustrate my thesis with three examples by John Donne, Jonathan Edwards and Laurence Sterne, three preachers who, faced with an insurmountable border – the necessity of explaining rationally the ineffable – recur to aporia in their discourses. It is my contention that the three sermons that I will discuss here exemplify what Derrida called the “plural logic of aporia” and show different ways in which the ministers can manipulate their audience to make them reach a certain truth, by convincing them of the impossibility to have access to that truth by themselves, therefore relying on the final authority of the Bible.
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Garrigós González, Cristina. 2009. “Manipulative Rhetoric in 17th and 18th Century Sermons: Aporia, the Borders of Reason”. Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses, no. 22 (November):99-114. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2009.22.07.
Copyright (c) 2009 Cristina Garrigós González
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.