Scientific writing: following Robert Boyle's principles in experimental essays -1704 and 1998
Keywords:Lenguaje científico, Experimentos científicos, Análisis del discurso, Siglo XVIII, Siglo XX, Evolución histórica, Boyle, Robert, Royal Society
AbstractScience and scientific method have evolved in parallel with changes in philosophical ideas. One aspect of the discipline affected by these changes is the way in which scientists' results should be shown to the world. However, it was not until the second half of the 17th century that the first recommendations or guidelines for reporting scientific discoveries appeared. The Royal Society became the first institution to concern itself with the form this new discourse should take. The aim of this paper is to analyse the linguistic evolution experienced by two pieces of scientific writing and to examine to what extent the two texts follow the recommendations of Robert Boyle and the Royal Society concerning the patterns scientific discourse should observe. Two texts were selected for the task, one published at the beginning of the 18th century, the other at the end of the 20th. For the purposes of comparison, the texts analysed are from the same discipline and both report an experiment on Optics.
FundingThe research reported on here was funded by the Xunta of Galicia through its Dirección Xeral de Investigación e Desenvolvemento, grant number PGIDIT03PXIB10402PR (supervised by Isabel Moskowich), by the Universidade da Coruña through its Vicerreitoría de Investigación (supervised by Begoña Crespo), and by the Consellería de Innovación e Industria.
Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Lareo Martín, Inés, and Ana Montoya Reyes. 2007. “Scientific Writing: Following Robert Boyle’s Principles in Experimental Essays -1704 and 1998”. Alicante Journal of English Studies / Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses, no. 20 (November):119-37. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2007.20.06.
Copyright (c) 2007 Inés Lareo Martín, Ana Montoya Reyes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.